Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Eșantionare intenționată bazată pe analiza de sensibilitate× | Eșantionare intenționată× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Metodologia anchetelor | Metodologia anchetelor |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1990s–2000s | Formalized ~1980–1990 |
| Autorul original≠ | Rooted in Patton's purposive sampling typology; sensitivity analysis practices formalized in research synthesis literature | Michael Quinn Patton (systematic articulation); roots in early qualitative inquiry |
| Tip≠ | Purposive qualitative sampling with robustness verification | Non-probability sampling strategy |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1412972123 | Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803937796 |
| Denumiri alternative≠ | purposive sampling with sensitivity checks, robust purposive sampling, sensitivity-tested purposive selection | judgmental sampling, selective sampling, criterion-based sampling, purposeful sampling |
| Înrudite≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Rezumat≠ | Sensitivity analysis-based purposive sampling extends conventional purposive sampling by systematically testing whether key findings or case-selection decisions change when the inclusion criteria, selection logic, or boundary conditions are altered. It applies the logic of sensitivity analysis — standard in quantitative research and systematic reviews — to qualitative case selection, giving researchers explicit evidence of how robust their purposive choices are to plausible alternative selection rules. | Purposive sampling is a non-probability strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects participants, documents, or cases that are information-rich with respect to the research question. Rather than drawing units at random, the researcher applies explicit criteria aligned with the study's purpose, maximising the depth and relevance of the data collected. It is the default sampling logic in most qualitative research designs and is also used in mixed-methods and applied evaluative work. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|