Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Eșantionare intenționată bazată pe analiza de sensibilitate× | Eșantionarea cazurilor deviante× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Metodologia anchetelor | Metodologia anchetelor |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1990 |
| Autorul original≠ | Rooted in Patton's purposive sampling typology; sensitivity analysis practices formalized in research synthesis literature | Michael Quinn Patton |
| Tip≠ | Purposive qualitative sampling with robustness verification | Purposive qualitative sampling strategy |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1412972123 | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711 |
| Denumiri alternative≠ | purposive sampling with sensitivity checks, robust purposive sampling, sensitivity-tested purposive selection | extreme case sampling, outlier sampling, negative case sampling, deviant-case selection |
| Înrudite | 5 | 5 |
| Rezumat≠ | Sensitivity analysis-based purposive sampling extends conventional purposive sampling by systematically testing whether key findings or case-selection decisions change when the inclusion criteria, selection logic, or boundary conditions are altered. It applies the logic of sensitivity analysis — standard in quantitative research and systematic reviews — to qualitative case selection, giving researchers explicit evidence of how robust their purposive choices are to plausible alternative selection rules. | Deviant case sampling is a purposive qualitative sampling strategy in which the researcher intentionally selects cases that are unusual, exceptional, or markedly different from the norm — outliers, extreme successes, or conspicuous failures. The goal is not statistical representation but deep learning from cases that illuminate the boundaries of a phenomenon, challenge prevailing assumptions, or reveal processes that typical cases obscure. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|