Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Rough-TODIM× | Proces Ierarhic Analitic× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Luarea deciziilor | Luarea deciziilor |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2024 | 1980 |
| Autorul original≠ | Tiwari, V. Khanna, P. Tandon, P. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Tip≠ | Rough outranking/ranking — Rough number (lower approximation L, upper approximation U) | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Tiwari, V., Khanna, P., Tandon, P. (2024). Capturing Design Intent During Concept Evaluation Using Rough Numbers and TODIM Method. Computer-Aided Design & Applications DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 |
| Denumiri alternative | — | — |
| Înrudite | 8 | 8 |
| Rezumat≠ | ROUGH-TODIM (Rough-TODIM — Rough extension of TODIM) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Tiwari, V. Khanna, P. Tandon, P. in 2024. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|