Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Validitate nomologică robustă× | Validitate Discriminantă× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Psihometrie | Psihometrie |
| Familie | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1955 | 1959 |
| Autorul original≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (seminal framework); later extended by Shadish, Cook, and Campbell | Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske |
| Tip≠ | Validity assessment / construct validation | Validity evidence / psychometric evaluation |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | nomological network validity, robust validity testing, nomological validity, RNV | discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity |
| Înrudite | 5 | 5 |
| Rezumat≠ | Robust nomological validity evaluates whether a psychological construct relates to theoretically expected variables in the predicted directions, using statistically robust estimation methods that remain trustworthy when distributional assumptions are violated. It tests the construct's place within its nomological network — the web of theoretical relationships that define its meaning. | Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|