ScholarGate
Asistent

Compară metode

Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.

Analiză Kaplan-Meier ajustată la risc×Potrivirea scorului de propensitate×
DomeniuEpidemiologieStatistică pentru cercetare
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Anul apariției2001–2004 (formal statistical framework for weighted KM curves)1983
Autorul originalConceptual basis: Kaplan & Meier (1958); risk-adjustment via IPTW formalised by Hernán, Brumback & Robins (2001), with practical implementation by Cole & Hernán (2004)Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TipAdjusted non-parametric survival methodMethod
Sursa seminalăCole, S. R., & Hernan, M. A. (2004). Adjusted survival curves with inverse probability weights. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 75(1), 45–49. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Denumiri alternativeweighted Kaplan-Meier, IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier, propensity-score-weighted survival curves, adjusted survival curvesPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Înrudite53
RezumatRisk-adjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis combines the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier estimator with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) or similar risk-adjustment procedures to produce survival curves that are comparable across groups as if the groups had identical distributions of baseline confounders. It is the observational-study analogue of plotting survival curves from a randomised trial.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateSet de date
  1. v1
  2. 2 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED

Mergi la căutare Descarcă prezentarea

ScholarGateCompară metode: Risk-adjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis · Propensity Score Matching. Preluat la 2026-06-18 de pe https://scholargate.app/ro/compare