Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Analiza Tematică Reflexivă× | Analiza Tematică× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu≠ | Calitativ | Cercetare calitativă |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019 | 2006 |
| Autorul original≠ | Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke | Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke |
| Tip≠ | Qualitative research method | Method |
| Sursa seminală | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative≠ | RTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis | TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis |
| Înrudite≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Rezumat≠ | Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed. | Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|