Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Metoda de Evaluare a Rădăcinii× | CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Luarea deciziilor | Luarea deciziilor |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2023 | 1995 |
| Autorul original≠ | Sotoudeh-Anvari, A. | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. |
| Tip≠ | Power-function aggregation with benefit/cost separation | Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Sotoudeh-Anvari, A. (2023). Root Assessment Method (RAM): A novel multi-criteria decision making method and its applications in sustainability challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production DOI ↗ | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | — | — |
| Înrudite≠ | 6 | 8 |
| Rezumat≠ | RAM (Root Assessment Method) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Sotoudeh-Anvari, A. in 2023. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|