Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Designul cu metode mixte multifazic, dominant cantitativ× | Design cu Metode Mixte Multilevel× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Design de cercetare | Design de cercetare |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2000s–2010s | Late 1990s–2000s |
| Autorul original≠ | Creswell & Plano Clark (multiphase framework); Tashakkori & Teddlie (priority notation) | Bonnie Nastasi, John Hitchcock, and collaborators; systematized by Creswell & Plano Clark |
| Tip | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. link ↗ | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1483357829 |
| Denumiri alternative | QUAN-dominant multiphase MMR, quantitatively driven multiphase design, multiphase mixed methods with quantitative priority, QUAN-priority multiphase design | multilevel MMR, nested mixed methods, hierarchical mixed methods design, cross-level mixed methods |
| Înrudite≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Rezumat≠ | A quantitative-dominant multiphase mixed methods design conducts a series of distinct research phases — at least two, often three or more — in which quantitative data and analyses bear the primary weight of answering the research questions, while qualitative components serve a supporting or explanatory role. Phases are linked by explicit integration points where findings from one phase inform the design or interpretation of the next. | Multilevel mixed methods design is a research approach that collects and integrates both quantitative and qualitative data at two or more distinct levels of a social or organizational hierarchy — for example, individuals nested within classrooms, classrooms within schools, or patients within healthcare teams. By pairing quantitative measurement of outcomes at one level with qualitative exploration of meaning at another, researchers gain a richer, more complete picture than either strand alone could provide. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|