Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Meta-inferență mixtă dominantă cantitativ× | Meta-inferența metodelor mixte× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Design de cercetare | Design de cercetare |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2003–2007 | 1998–2003 |
| Autorul original≠ | Tashakkori & Teddlie (meta-inference concept); Creswell & Plano Clark (dominance weighting framework) | Abbas Tashakkori & Charles Teddlie |
| Tip | Mixed methods integration procedure | Mixed methods integration procedure |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761920731 | Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761930129 |
| Denumiri alternative | QUAN-dominant meta-inference, quantitatively weighted meta-inference, QUAN-priority integration inference, quantitative-weighted mixed inference | meta-inference, mixed methods overall inference, integrated inference, MMR meta-inference |
| Înrudite | 6 | 6 |
| Rezumat≠ | Quantitative-dominant mixed methods meta-inference is an integration procedure in which the researcher draws an overarching conclusion by combining inferences from both quantitative and qualitative strands, while explicitly assigning greater evidential weight to the quantitative results. The qualitative strand serves a supporting, elaborating, or contextualizing role rather than an equal voice in the final interpretation. | Mixed methods meta-inference is the overarching conclusion drawn at the end of a mixed methods study by systematically combining and integrating the separate inferences produced by the quantitative and qualitative strands. It represents the highest-level interpretive act in mixed methods research: moving beyond strand-specific findings to produce a unified, coherent understanding of the research problem that neither strand could yield alone. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|