Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Meta-inferență mixtă dominantă cantitativ× | Designul de metode mixte cu triangulare concurentă× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Design de cercetare | Design de cercetare |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2003–2007 | 2007 (formally named in Creswell & Plano Clark, 1st ed.) |
| Autorul original≠ | Tashakkori & Teddlie (meta-inference concept); Creswell & Plano Clark (dominance weighting framework) | John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| Tip≠ | Mixed methods integration procedure | Mixed methods research design |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761920731 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1412975179 |
| Denumiri alternative | QUAN-dominant meta-inference, quantitatively weighted meta-inference, QUAN-priority integration inference, quantitative-weighted mixed inference | convergent parallel design, triangulation design, QUAN+QUAL concurrent design, simultaneous triangulation |
| Înrudite≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Rezumat≠ | Quantitative-dominant mixed methods meta-inference is an integration procedure in which the researcher draws an overarching conclusion by combining inferences from both quantitative and qualitative strands, while explicitly assigning greater evidential weight to the quantitative results. The qualitative strand serves a supporting, elaborating, or contextualizing role rather than an equal voice in the final interpretation. | The concurrent triangulation mixed methods design collects quantitative and qualitative data simultaneously, analyzes each strand independently, and then merges the results to assess whether the two data sources corroborate one another. Often called the convergent parallel design, it is one of the foundational configurations in mixed methods research and is chosen specifically when the researcher wants to cross-validate or triangulate findings from two distinct methodological traditions. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|