Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Metode mixte pragmatice cu dominanță calitativă× | Design Mixt cu Prioritate Calitativă× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Design de cercetare | Design de cercetare |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1990s–2010s | 1991–2003 (formalized in mixed methods typologies) |
| Autorul original≠ | David L. Morgan; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark | Janice Morse; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| Tip | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Morgan, D. L. (2014). Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: A Pragmatic Approach. Sage. ISBN: 978-1452204949 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| Denumiri alternative | QUAL-dominant pragmatic MMR, qualitative-priority pragmatic mixed methods, qual-dominant pragmatic design, QUAL+quan pragmatic | QUAL-dominant mixed methods, qualitative-dominant mixed design, qual-priority MMR, qualitative-weighted mixed methods |
| Înrudite | 6 | 6 |
| Rezumat≠ | Qualitative-dominant pragmatic mixed methods is a research design in which a qualitative strand carries the primary weight of the inquiry, while a smaller quantitative component adds breadth or corroboration. Grounded in pragmatism as its philosophical framework, the design treats questions of data type, sequence, and integration as practical choices driven by the research problem rather than by methodological ideology. | Qualitative-priority mixed methods design is a mixed methods approach in which qualitative inquiry carries the greater weight — in terms of volume, analytical depth, and interpretive authority — while a supplementary quantitative strand provides supporting evidence. The design acknowledges that the phenomenon under study is best understood through meaning-making, lived experience, or social processes, with numbers used to corroborate or contextualize, not to dominate, the research story. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|