Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Design Pragmatic de Metode Mixte× | Design Mixt Transformator× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Design de cercetare | Design de cercetare |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | Early 2000s (formalised); pragmatism as philosophy late 19th–early 20th century | 2003–2009 |
| Autorul original≠ | John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (formalised); philosophical grounding in William James, John Dewey, Richard Rorty | Donna M. Mertens; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| Tip | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| Denumiri alternative | pragmatic MMR, pragmatism-guided mixed methods, pragmatic inquiry design, practical mixed methods | transformative design, advocacy mixed methods, emancipatory mixed methods, social-justice mixed methods |
| Înrudite | 6 | 6 |
| Rezumat≠ | Pragmatic mixed methods design is a research approach that selects and combines quantitative and qualitative methods based on what best answers the research question, rather than adhering to a single philosophical paradigm. Rooted in the philosophical tradition of pragmatism — associated with William James, John Dewey, and later Richard Rorty — it treats methodological fit and practical utility as the primary criteria for design decisions. The approach is endorsed by leading mixed methods scholars including Creswell and Plano Clark as the most common philosophical worldview underpinning mixed methods work. | Transformative mixed methods design embeds a social-justice or advocacy theoretical framework — such as feminism, critical race theory, disability studies, or indigenous worldviews — as the overarching lens that guides every decision about data collection, integration, and use. Both quantitative and qualitative strands serve the goal of advancing equity, challenging power structures, and producing actionable knowledge for marginalized communities. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|