Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| MABAC Plitogenic (cu ponderare BWM și incertitudine Număr Brut)× | Proces Ierarhic Analitic× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Luarea deciziilor | Luarea deciziilor |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2015 | 1980 |
| Autorul original≠ | Pamučar, D. Ćirović, G. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Tip≠ | Plithogenic-rough border approximation area (PL+RN+MABAC) | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Pamučar, D., Ćirović, G. (2015). The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using MABAC. Expert Systems with Applications link ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 |
| Denumiri alternative | — | — |
| Înrudite≠ | 3 | 8 |
| Rezumat≠ | PL-MABAC (Plithogenic MABAC (with BWM weighting and Rough Number uncertainty)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Pamučar, D. Ćirović, G. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|