ScholarGate
Asistent

Compară metode

Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.

Extensie probabilistă ezitantă a COPRAS×Proces Ierarhic Analitic×Procesul Analitic al Rețelei (AHP cu feedback și interdependențe)×Metoda Best-Worst×CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation×
DomeniuLuarea deciziilorLuarea deciziilorLuarea deciziilorLuarea deciziilorLuarea deciziilor
FamilieMCDMMCDMMCDMMCDMMCDM
Anul apariției20211980199620151995
Autorul originalSong, H. F. Chen, Z. C.Saaty, T. L.Saaty, T. L.Rezaei, J.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TipProbabilistic Hesitant ranking — Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Element (PHFE: {γ|p} pairs)Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure)Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LPStatistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Sursa seminalăSong, H. F., Chen, Z. C. (2021). Multi-attribute decision-making method based distance and COPRAS method with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environment. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems DOI ↗Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Denumiri alternative
Înrudite88888
RezumatPHF-COPRAS (Probabilistic Hesitant extension of COPRAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Song, H. F. Chen, Z. C. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateSet de date
  1. v1
  2. 1 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED

Mergi la căutare Descarcă prezentarea

ScholarGateCompară metode: PHF-COPRAS · AHP · ANP · BWM · CRITIC. Preluat la 2026-06-19 de pe https://scholargate.app/ro/compare