Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Extensia Pitagorică a metodei COPRAS× | Proces Ierarhic Analitic× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Luarea deciziilor | Luarea deciziilor |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2014 | 1980 |
| Autorul original≠ | Yager, R. R. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Tip≠ | Pythagorean outranking/ranking — Pythagorean Fuzzy Number (PFN: μ, ν; μ²+ν² ≤ 1) | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Yager, R. R. (2014). Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 |
| Denumiri alternative | — | — |
| Înrudite | 8 | 8 |
| Rezumat≠ | PF-COPRAS (Pythagorean extension of COPRAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Yager, R. R. in 2014. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|