Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Cercetare Biografică Participativă× | Istoria Orală× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Calitativ | Calitativ |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1948 (modern disciplinary form); broader roots in 19th-century folklore and anthropology |
| Autorul original≠ | Intersection of biographical methods tradition (Denzin, Chamberlayne) and participatory action research (Lewin, Reason & Bradbury) | Allan Nevins (Columbia University Oral History Project, 1948); earlier roots in folk-life and anthropological fieldwork |
| Tip≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative research method |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Chamberlayne, P., Bornat, J., & Wengraf, T. (Eds.). (2000). The Turn to Biographical Methods in Social Science: Comparative Issues and Examples. Routledge. ISBN: 9780415196659 | Ritchie, D. A. (2003). Doing Oral History: A Practical Guide (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195176957 |
| Denumiri alternative | collaborative biography, participatory life history, co-constructed biographical inquiry, PBR | life history interview, oral testimony, spoken history, oral narrative research |
| Înrudite | 6 | 6 |
| Rezumat≠ | Participatory Biographical Research (PBR) combines the in-depth life-story tradition of biographical methods with the collaborative ethos of participatory inquiry. Participants are not merely sources of data; they are active co-researchers who help design questions, interpret their own narratives, and validate emerging findings. The result is a richly layered account of individual lives that is jointly owned by both researcher and participant. | Oral history is a qualitative research method that collects, preserves, and interprets first-person spoken accounts of past events, experiences, and social processes. By recording in-depth interviews with individuals who witnessed or participated in historical events, oral historians document perspectives that written records often exclude. The method bridges historical scholarship and social science, treating the narrator's memory, subjectivity, and voice as primary evidence rather than as limitations to be corrected. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|