Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Examinare parazitologică× | Sisteme de scor clinic în medicina veterinară× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Medicină veterinară | Medicină veterinară |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1800s-present | 2000s |
| Autorul original≠ | Veterinary parasitology discipline | Veterinary Pain Society and AAFP |
| Tip≠ | Laboratory diagnostic pipeline | Assessment pipeline |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Bowman, D. D. (2009). Georgis' Parasitology for Veterinarians (9th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders. link ↗ | Hansen, B. D., Lascelles, B. D., Keates, H., et al. (2015). Painful Osteoarthritis in Cats: Chronic Pain Assessment, Management, and Welfare Considerations. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, 17(8), 637-646. link ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative≠ | parasite screening, fecal examination, parasitism diagnosis | clinical assessment scoring, veterinary patient scoring |
| Înrudite | 3 | 3 |
| Rezumat≠ | Parasitological examination is a systematic laboratory diagnostic process for detecting and identifying parasites and parasitic infections in animals. Foundational to veterinary medicine since the 1800s and formalized through modern standard operating procedures, it relies on morphological identification of eggs, larvae, oocysts, or adult parasites in feces, blood, tissue, or other body specimens to establish parasitic diagnoses and guide therapeutic and preventive decisions. | Clinical scoring systems provide standardized methods for objectively assessing animal health status, pain, disease severity, and treatment outcomes. Developed progressively by veterinary organizations and research groups since the early 2000s, these systems enable consistent documentation, comparison of cases, and evidence-based clinical decision-making across species and practice settings. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|