Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Extensia plithogenică a P-WISP× | CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Luarea deciziilor | Luarea deciziilor |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2018 | 1995 |
| Autorul original≠ | Smarandache, F. | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. |
| Tip≠ | Plithogenic outranking/ranking — Plithogenic Set (PltS: attribute values with contradiction degrees) | Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Smarandache, F. (2018). Plithogeny, Plithogenic Set, Logic, Probability, and Statistics. Pons Publishing, Brussels link ↗ | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | — | — |
| Înrudite | 8 | 8 |
| Rezumat≠ | P-WISP (Plithogenic extension of P-WISP) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Smarandache, F. in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|