Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Mediere Ponderată Ordonată× | Proces Ierarhic Analitic× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Luarea deciziilor | Luarea deciziilor |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1988; GIS extension 1997 | 1980 |
| Autorul original≠ | Yager, R. R. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Tip≠ | Parameterised additive aggregation with reordered criterion weights (AND ↔ WLC ↔ OR continuum) | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Yager, R. R. (1988). On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 |
| Denumiri alternative | — | — |
| Înrudite | 8 | 8 |
| Rezumat≠ | OWA (Ordered Weighted Averaging) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Yager, R. R. in 1988; GIS extension 1997. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|