Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Open-Ended Political Response Coding× | Scala de Ideologie Politică× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Psihologie politică | Psihologie politică |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1952 | 1990 |
| Autorul original≠ | American National Election Studies / Klaus Krippendorff | Hans-Dieter Klingemann & Norberto Bobbio |
| Tip≠ | Qualitative content coding | Self-report |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. ISBN: 9780761915454 | Fuchs, D., & Klingemann, H. D. (1990). The left-right schema. In M. Kent Jennings & Jan W. Van Deth (Eds.), Continuities in political action. Berlin: De Gruyter. link ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative≠ | Open-Ended Coding, Likes-Dislikes Coding, Verbatim Response Coding, Master Code Scheme | Left-Right Scale, Ideology Continuum, Political Spectrum Scale |
| Înrudite≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Rezumat≠ | Open-ended political response coding is the systematic content analysis of verbatim survey answers, classically the American National Election Studies likes/dislikes about parties and candidates, into a categorical scheme so they can be analyzed quantitatively. It applies content-analysis methodology (Krippendorff, 2004) to capture the substance and sophistication of citizens' political thinking that closed-ended items cannot. | The Political Ideology Scale measures individual self-placement on a left-right political spectrum, capturing fundamental preferences for government role, economic organization, and social values. The single-item self-placement measure (most common) asks respondents to rate themselves on a 0-10 or 0-100 continuum; multi-item versions assess distinct ideological dimensions (economic policy, social policy, nationalism). The left-right axis remains the dominant organizing principle of political competition globally, predicting party choice, policy preferences, and electoral behavior despite critiques that it oversimplifies multidimensional political space. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|