Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Scala Numerică de Evaluare a Durerii× | Inventarul Scurt al Durerii× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Servicii de sănătate | Servicii de sănătate |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1986 | 1994 |
| Autorul original≠ | Mark P. Jensen and colleagues | Charles S. Cleeland and Kathryn M. Ryan |
| Tip≠ | Unidimensional pain severity measurement | Pain severity and interference measurement |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Jensen, M. P., Karoly, P., & Braver, S. (1986). The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain, 27(3), 297-307. DOI ↗ | Cleeland, C. S., & Ryan, K. M. (1994). Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore, 23(2), 129-138. link ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative≠ | NRS, NRS-11, NRS-101 | BPI, BPI-SF |
| Înrudite≠ | 2 | 3 |
| Rezumat≠ | The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is a single-item, self-report measure of pain intensity developed by Jensen and colleagues in 1986. Patients rate their pain on an 11-point scale (0-10) where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst pain imaginable. The NRS is among the most widely used pain severity measures in clinical practice and research due to its simplicity, rapid administration, and robust measurement properties. | The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) is a concise, validated self-report instrument developed by Cleeland and Ryan beginning in 1994 to measure the severity and functional impact of pain in patients with cancer and chronic pain conditions. The BPI-Short Form comprises 11 items assessing pain severity and interference with daily activities, enabling rapid multidimensional pain assessment across diverse clinical populations. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|