ScholarGate
Asistent

Compară metode

Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.

O nouă metodă de determinare a ponderilor obiective ale criteriilor×AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation)×
DomeniuLuarea deciziilorLuarea deciziilor
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Anul apariției20172022
Autorul originalBulut, E.Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M.
TipWeight_Objective (normalised matrix column-mean based)Two-step normalisation (linear + vector) with weighted power aggregation
Sursa seminalăBulut, E. (2017). A comparative analysis of the criteria weights determination methods for selection of ship propulsion system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment link ↗Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. (2022). AROMAN — Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering link ↗
Denumiri alternative
Înrudite88
RezumatNMD (New Method of Determining objective criterion weights) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bulut, E. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateSet de date
  1. v1
  2. 1 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED

Mergi la căutare Descarcă prezentarea

ScholarGateCompară metode: NMD · AROMAN. Preluat la 2026-06-17 de pe https://scholargate.app/ro/compare