Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Extensia neutrosofică a EDAS× | Sistem de măsurare a impactului criteriilor× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Luarea deciziilor | Luarea deciziilor |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2021 | 2025 |
| Autorul original≠ | Stanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Popović, G., Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., Zavadskas, E. K., Smarandache, F. | Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. |
| Tip≠ | Neutrosophic outranking/ranking — Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3) | Impact-based weighted scoring (criterion-level deviation analysis) |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Stanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Popović, G., Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., Zavadskas, E. K., Smarandache, F. (2021). A single-valued neutrosophic extension of the EDAS method. Axioms DOI ↗ | Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. (2025). A New Criteria Importance Assessment (CIMAS) Method in Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making: Criteria Evaluation for Supplier Selection. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS — Series: Mechanical Engineering DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | — | — |
| Înrudite | 8 | 8 |
| Rezumat≠ | N-EDAS (Neutrosophic extension of EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Stanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Popović, G., Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., Zavadskas, E. K., Smarandache, F. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CIMAS (Criterion Impact MeAsurement System) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. in 2025. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|