Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Extensie neutrosofică a AROMAN× | CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Luarea deciziilor | Luarea deciziilor |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2023 | 1995 |
| Autorul original≠ | Bošković et al. | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. |
| Tip≠ | Neutrosophic outranking/ranking — Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3) | Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Bošković et al. (2023). Neutrosophic Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for two-step Normalization. IEEE Access link ↗ | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | — | — |
| Înrudite | 8 | 8 |
| Rezumat≠ | N-AROMAN (Neutrosophic extension of AROMAN) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bošković et al. in 2023. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|