Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Fiabilitate test-retest multinivel× | Fiabilitatea test-retest× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Psihometrie | Psihometrie |
| Familie | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1979 (ICC foundation); multilevel extension: 1990s–2000s | 1904 |
| Autorul original≠ | Shrout & Fleiss (ICC foundation); multilevel extension by Goldstein, Snijders, and others | Karl Pearson |
| Tip≠ | Reliability estimation under hierarchical data | Reliability estimate |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Shrout, P. E. & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428. DOI ↗ | Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-0070478497 |
| Denumiri alternative | hierarchical test-retest reliability, multilevel ICC reliability, nested test-retest reliability, ML-TRT reliability | stability reliability, temporal stability, repeatability coefficient, TRT reliability |
| Înrudite≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Rezumat≠ | Multilevel test-retest reliability estimates how consistently a measurement instrument produces the same scores across repeated administrations when observations are nested within higher-level units — such as patients within clinics or students within classrooms. It partitions total score variance across levels using intraclass correlation coefficients derived from multilevel models. | Test-retest reliability quantifies the temporal consistency of a measure by correlating scores obtained from the same participants on two separate occasions. It is a cornerstone of psychometric validation, directly indicating whether a scale or instrument yields stable scores when the underlying construct has not changed. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|