Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| TOPSIS Hesitant Fuzzy m-Polar (Akram, Adeel & Alcantud 2019, Symmetry 11(6):795)× | Proces Ierarhic Analitic× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Luarea deciziilor | Luarea deciziilor |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2019 | 1980 |
| Autorul original≠ | Akram, M., Adeel, A., Alcantud, J. C. R. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Tip≠ | Distance-based ranking — m-polar hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS — pole-wise max/min ideals on a weighted mHF decision matrix (Eqs. 1–2), mHF Euclidean distance (Eqs. 3–4), closeness coefficient E_j' (Eq. 5) | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Akram, M., Adeel, A., Alcantud, J. C. R. (2019). Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Using an m-Polar Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach. Symmetry (MDPI) DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 |
| Denumiri alternative | — | — |
| Înrudite≠ | 3 | 8 |
| Rezumat≠ | MPF-HF-TOPSIS (m-Polar Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS (Akram, Adeel & Alcantud 2019, Symmetry 11(6):795) — multi-criteria group decision-making by extending TOPSIS to the m-polar hesitant fuzzy (mHF) set framework; pole-wise mHPIS/mHNIS extraction, mHF Euclidean distance and closeness coefficient ranking) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Akram, M., Adeel, A., Alcantud, J. C. R. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|