Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Most Significant Change× | Empowerment Evaluation× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Public Policy | Public Policy |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2005 | 1994 |
| Autorul original≠ | Rick Davies & Jess Dart | David Fetterman |
| Tip≠ | Participatory, story-based monitoring and evaluation technique | Participatory, capacity-building evaluation approach |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Davies, R., & Dart, J. (2005). The 'Most Significant Change' (MSC) Technique: A Guide to Its Use. link ↗ | Fetterman, D. M. (1994). Empowerment evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15(1), 1–15. DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative≠ | MSC, MSC Technique, Story-Based Monitoring, Davies-Dart Most Significant Change | Fetterman Empowerment Evaluation, Self-Determination Evaluation |
| Înrudite | 4 | 4 |
| Rezumat≠ | The Most Significant Change (MSC) technique is a participatory, story-based approach to monitoring and evaluation developed by Rick Davies and refined with Jess Dart. It involves the systematic collection of stories of significant change from the field and the deliberative selection of the most significant of these by panels of stakeholders. There are no predefined indicators; instead, value judgements about what change matters most are made transparently by those involved, making MSC especially suited to capturing unexpected and qualitative outcomes in complex programs. | Empowerment evaluation is a participatory approach in which an evaluator acts as a coach and critical friend, helping program staff and community members evaluate their own work so as to foster improvement and self-determination. Introduced by David Fetterman in his 1994 presidential address to the American Evaluation Association, it deliberately shifts control of the evaluation to the people running the program. The goal is not only to assess merit and worth but to build the group's internal capacity for evaluative thinking and to embed evaluation as a routine, owned part of organisational life. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|