Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Moral Foundations Questionnaire× | Scala Autoritarismului de Dreapta× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu≠ | Psihologie politică | Psihologie socială |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2011 | 1981 |
| Autorul original≠ | Jesse Graham, Jonathan Haidt et al. | Bob Altemeyer |
| Tip≠ | Self-report values inventory | Self-report Likert scale |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366-385. DOI ↗ | Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press. link ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative≠ | MFQ, MFQ-30, Moral Foundations Theory Questionnaire | RWA |
| Înrudite | 4 | 4 |
| Rezumat≠ | The Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ) is a 30-item self-report instrument developed by Graham, Haidt and colleagues (2011) to measure the degree to which people rely on five intuitive moral foundations: Care/harm, Fairness/cheating, Loyalty/betrayal, Authority/subversion, and Sanctity/degradation. It is the standard operationalization of Moral Foundations Theory, which argues that political and cultural moral disagreements arise from differing weights placed on these foundations. | The Right-Wing Authoritarianism Scale (RWA) is a self-report measure developed by Bob Altemeyer in 1981 to assess individual differences in authoritarian attitudes, including submission to established authorities, adherence to conventional norms, and aggression toward those perceived to violate social conventions. The scale measures three core dimensions: authoritarian submission, authoritarian aggression, and conventionalism. It has become a cornerstone of research on authoritarianism, political attitudes, and intergroup prejudice. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|