Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Testul medianei lui Mood× | Testul post-hoc Conover-Iman× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Statistică | Statistică |
| Familie | Regression model | Regression model |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1954 | 1979 |
| Autorul original≠ | A. M. Mood | Conover & Iman |
| Tip≠ | Nonparametric median comparison | Nonparametric post-hoc multiple comparison |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Mood, A. M. (1954). On the Asymptotic Efficiency of Certain Nonparametric Two-Sample Tests. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 25(3), 514-522. DOI ↗ | Conover, W. J. & Iman, R. L. (1979). On Multiple-Comparisons Procedures. Technical Report LA-7677-MS, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory. link ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | median test, Brown-Mood median test, Mood Medyan Testi | Conover-Iman post-hoc test, Conover post-hoc test, Conover-Iman Post-Hoc Testi |
| Înrudite | 3 | 3 |
| Rezumat≠ | Mood's median test is a nonparametric procedure that compares the medians of k independent groups by counting how many observations in each group fall above and below the pooled (grand) median, then applying a chi-square test to the resulting 2×k contingency table. It traces to A. M. Mood's 1954 work on nonparametric two-sample tests. | The Conover-Iman test is a rank-based post-hoc procedure, introduced by Conover and Iman in 1979, that identifies which pairs of groups differ after a significant Kruskal-Wallis or Friedman test. It builds a t-style statistic on the pooled ranks and is generally more powerful than the comparable Dunn test. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|