ScholarGate
Asistent

Compară metode

Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.

Analiza modularității×Centralitatea de intermediere×
DomeniuAnaliza rețelelorAnaliza rețelelor
FamilieMachine learningMachine learning
Anul apariției20041977
Autorul originalNewman, M. E. J. & Girvan, M.Freeman, L. C.
TipCommunity detection / graph partitioningCentrality measure
Sursa seminalăNewman, M. E. J., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69(2), 026113. DOI ↗Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35–41. DOI ↗
Denumiri alternativeQ-modularity, community structure detection, network modularity optimization, graph partitioning by modularityFreeman betweenness, BC, geodesic betweenness, shortest-path betweenness
Înrudite56
RezumatModularity analysis is a network science method, formalized by Newman and Girvan in 2004, that detects community structure in graphs by measuring whether edges are more concentrated within groups than expected by chance. Its scalar quality index Q guides algorithms that partition nodes into cohesive clusters, making it the most widely adopted framework for community detection in social, biological, and technological networks.Betweenness centrality, formalized by Linton C. Freeman in 1977, measures how often a node lies on the shortest path connecting every other pair of nodes in a network. High-betweenness nodes act as bridges or brokers: removing them fragments the network into disconnected components more severely than removing any other nodes.
ScholarGateSet de date
  1. v1
  2. 2 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED

Mergi la căutare Descarcă prezentarea

ScholarGateCompară metode: Modularity Analysis · Betweenness Centrality. Preluat la 2026-06-15 de pe https://scholargate.app/ro/compare