ScholarGate
Asistent

Compară metode

Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.

Meta-etnografie×Meta-sinteză calitativă×
DomeniuScientometrieSinteza dovezilor
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Anul apariției19882007
Autorul originalGeorge W. Noblit and R. Dwight HareSandelowski & Barroso (2007), Popularized by Thomas & Harden (2008)
TipQualitative evidence synthesis methodFramework
Sursa seminalăNoblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803930780Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45. DOI ↗
Denumiri alternativequalitative meta-synthesis, interpretive synthesis, ethnographic synthesis, meta-ethnographic reviewQualitative Evidence Synthesis, Thematic Synthesis, Metasynthesis, Qualitative Systematic Review
Înrudite42
RezumatMeta-ethnography is a systematic method for synthesising findings across multiple qualitative studies by comparing and translating the conceptual frameworks and metaphors each study uses. Developed by Noblit and Hare in 1988, it produces a new interpretive account that goes beyond any single study, preserving the richness of qualitative data while generating broader theoretical insights. It is the most influential approach to qualitative evidence synthesis in health, social, and educational research.Qualitative meta-synthesis is a systematic method for synthesizing findings from multiple qualitative research studies (interviews, focus groups, ethnographies) to develop integrated interpretations and theoretical insights. Formalized by Sandelowski and Barroso (2007) and popularized by Thomas and Harden (2008), qualitative meta-synthesis preserves the rich, contextual, interpretive nature of qualitative evidence while enabling broader conclusions across multiple studies. Unlike quantitative meta-analysis, which pools numbers, qualitative meta-synthesis synthesizes themes, meanings, and conceptual insights—answering questions like 'How do cancer patients experience treatment side effects?' or 'What factors shape patient engagement with preventive health programs?' across multiple studies.
ScholarGateSet de date
  1. v1
  2. 2 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED

Mergi la căutare Descarcă prezentarea

ScholarGateCompară metode: Meta-ethnography · Qualitative Meta-Synthesis. Preluat la 2026-06-19 de pe https://scholargate.app/ro/compare