Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Memory-Work Method× | Feminist Standpoint Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Gender Studies | Gender Studies |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1987 | 1983 |
| Autorul original≠ | Frigga Haug | Nancy Hartsock, Dorothy Smith, Sandra Harding |
| Tip≠ | Collective feminist qualitative method | Critical feminist epistemology and analytic framework |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Haug, F. (Ed.) (1987). Female Sexualization: A Collective Work of Memory (E. Carter, Trans.). Verso, London. ISBN: 9780860918173 | Harding, S. (1991). Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY. ISBN: 9780801497469 |
| Denumiri alternative | Memory Work, Collective Memory-Work, Frigga Haug Memory Work | Standpoint Theory, Feminist Standpoint Epistemology, Standpoint Methodology |
| Înrudite | 4 | 4 |
| Rezumat≠ | Memory-work is a collective feminist research method, devised by Frigga Haug and her colleagues in the 1980s, in which a group of co-researchers each writes down concrete memories about a shared theme and then analyzes those memories together to uncover how gendered subjectivities are socially constructed. By treating their own remembered experiences as data, participants dissolve the boundary between researcher and researched and expose the everyday processes through which people actively make themselves into the gendered subjects society expects them to become. | Feminist standpoint analysis is a critical epistemology and analytic strategy holding that all knowledge is socially situated, and that beginning inquiry from the everyday lives of marginalized people — historically women — yields a more complete and less distorted account of social reality than the supposedly neutral view from dominant positions. Developed by Nancy Hartsock, Dorothy Smith, and Sandra Harding in the 1980s, it argues that the marginalized see both the dominant order and its underside, and that this doubled vision, when methodically developed into an achieved standpoint, can ground a 'strong objectivity' superior to claims of value-free detachment. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|