ScholarGate
Asistent

Compară metode

Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.

Metode de Potrivire (CEM / Optimală / Genetică)×Efectul Mediu Local al Tratamentului (LATE / CACE)×
DomeniuInferență cauzalăInferență cauzală
FamilieRegression modelRegression model
Anul apariției20121994
Autorul originalIacus, King & Porro (CEM); Hansen (optimal/full matching)Imbens & Angrist (1994); Angrist, Imbens & Rubin (1996)
TipMatching for causal inferenceInstrumental-variable causal estimand
Sursa seminalăIacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗Imbens, G. W., & Angrist, J. D. (1994). Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects. Econometrica, 62(2), 467-475. DOI ↗
Denumiri alternativecoarsened exact matching, optimal matching, genetic matching, CEMLATE, CACE, complier average causal effect, Yerel Ortalama Tedavi Etkisi (LATE / CACE)
Înrudite55
RezumatMatching Methods are a family of causal-inference techniques beyond propensity-score matching that pair treated and control units with similar covariates so that a treatment effect can be read off the balanced sample. The family includes Coarsened Exact Matching (Iacus, King & Porro, 2012), optimal matching, and genetic matching.The Local Average Treatment Effect is an instrumental-variable estimand, introduced by Imbens and Angrist (1994) and formalised with Rubin (1996), that recovers the average treatment effect for the subpopulation of compliers — units whose treatment status is actually moved by the instrument. It is closely tied to compliance analysis.
ScholarGateSet de date
  1. v1
  2. 2 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED

Mergi la căutare Descarcă prezentarea

ScholarGateCompară metode: Matching Methods · Local Average Treatment Effect. Preluat la 2026-06-17 de pe https://scholargate.app/ro/compare