Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Analiza Tematică Reflexivă Longitudinală× | Analiză Tematică Reflexivă Interpretativă× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Calitativ | Calitativ |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2006 (RTA seminal); longitudinal application developed through 2010s | 2006 (foundational); interpretivist framing consolidated 2019–2021 |
| Autorul original≠ | Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke (reflexive thematic analysis); longitudinal design adapted from qualitative longitudinal research traditions (Saldaña, 2003) | Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke |
| Tip≠ | Qualitative analytic method applied longitudinally | Qualitative data analysis approach |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | longitudinal RTA, repeated-wave thematic analysis, longitudinal qualitative thematic analysis, L-RTA | Interpretive RTA, reflexive TA (interpretivist), constructivist reflexive thematic analysis, interpretivist thematic analysis |
| Înrudite≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Rezumat≠ | Longitudinal Reflexive Thematic Analysis (L-RTA) applies Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis framework to qualitative data collected from the same participants (or context) at two or more time points. Rather than producing a single static account, it tracks how meanings, experiences, and themes evolve, persist, or transform over time, foregrounding the researcher's active reflexive engagement at every stage of the iterative process. | Interpretive Reflexive Thematic Analysis applies Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis framework explicitly within an interpretivist epistemological stance. The analyst treats meaning as co-constructed between researcher and data, foregrounds their own subjective positionality throughout the coding and theming process, and produces theoretically rich accounts of participant perspectives rather than surface-level content summaries. It is among the most widely used analytical approaches in contemporary qualitative research. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|