Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Etnografia Instituțională Longitudinală× | Etnografie Instituțională Participativă× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Calitativ | Calitativ |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1987 (IE foundation); longitudinal applications from 1990s onward | 1990s–2000s |
| Autorul original≠ | Dorothy E. Smith (institutional ethnography); longitudinal extension by subsequent IE practitioners | Dorothy E. Smith (IE); participatory variant developed by Janet Rankin, Marie Campbell, and others in health and social sciences |
| Tip≠ | Qualitative longitudinal research design | Qualitative research design |
| Sursa seminală | Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759106598 | Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759105010 |
| Denumiri alternative≠ | longitudinal IE, time-extended institutional ethnography, longitudinal IE study, IE longitudinal design | participatory IE, community-based institutional ethnography, collaborative institutional ethnography |
| Înrudite | 6 | 6 |
| Rezumat≠ | Longitudinal Institutional Ethnography (longitudinal IE) combines Dorothy Smith's sociology of standpoint — institutional ethnography — with repeated data collection over time to trace how institutional texts, relations, and ruling practices shape people's everyday lives across a temporal span. By revisiting the same participants, settings, or documents at multiple time points, it reveals how institutional coordination evolves, accumulates, or intensifies over weeks, months, or years. | Participatory Institutional Ethnography (PIE) combines Dorothy Smith's institutional ethnography with participatory research principles, positioning community members or service users as co-researchers who investigate how institutional relations, ruling texts, and organizational practices shape and often constrain their everyday lives. The approach aims both to produce knowledge about institutional coordination and to generate actionable change through collaborative inquiry. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|