Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Cercetare arhivistică istorică longitudinală× | Metoda istoriei orale× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Metode de teren | Metode de teren |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 20th century (formalized in social science methodology by the 1970s–1990s) | 1948 (systematic practice); broader theorisation 1970s–1990s |
| Autorul original≠ | Established practice in historical and social science research traditions | Columbia University Oral History Research Office (Allan Nevins); later theorised by Alessandro Portelli and Donald Ritchie |
| Tip≠ | Qualitative/mixed archival research design | Qualitative historical-empirical method |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Scott, J. (1990). A Matter of Record: Documentary Sources in Social Research. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745602578 | Ritchie, D. A. (2015). Doing Oral History (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0199329960 |
| Denumiri alternative | longitudinal archival study, diachronic archival research, historical longitudinal analysis, archival panel research | oral history research, life history interviewing, oral testimony research, OHM |
| Înrudite≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Rezumat≠ | Longitudinal historical archival research is a qualitative and documentary method that systematically examines primary archival sources — records, manuscripts, correspondence, institutional files — across multiple points in time to trace change, continuity, or development within a phenomenon over an extended historical period. By imposing a longitudinal dimension on standard archival inquiry, researchers can reconstruct how events, structures, policies, or social conditions evolved rather than capturing only a single historical moment. | The oral history method is a qualitative research approach in which researchers conduct in-depth, recorded interviews with individuals who have direct personal experience of a historical event, social process, or community life. It captures subjective perspectives, memory, and lived experience that written records rarely preserve, making it indispensable for recovering voices absent from official archives — particularly those of marginalised communities, minority groups, and ordinary people. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|