Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Logic Model× | Concept Mapping× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Social Work | Social Work |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2004 | 1989 |
| Autorul original≠ | Program-evaluation tradition; popularized by the W. K. Kellogg Foundation | William M. K. Trochim |
| Tip≠ | Diagram linking program resources and activities to intended outcomes | Mixed-method structured group conceptualization producing a visual cluster map |
| Sursa seminală≠ | W. K. Kellogg Foundation. (2004). Logic Model Development Guide. W. K. Kellogg Foundation. link ↗ | Trochim, W. M. K. (1989). An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(1), 1–16. DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | Program Logic Model, Logical Framework, Program Theory Model, Logic Model (Social Work) | Group Concept Mapping, Structured Conceptualization, Trochim Concept Mapping, Concept Mapping for Planning and Evaluation |
| Înrudite | 4 | 4 |
| Rezumat≠ | A logic model is a diagram that lays out the intended logic of a program — how its resources and activities are expected to produce outputs and, through them, short-, intermediate-, and long-term outcomes. Popularized in human services by the W. K. Kellogg Foundation's development guide, it makes a program's underlying theory of change explicit and testable, providing the backbone for program planning, communication with stakeholders, and evaluation by clarifying exactly what the program does and what it is supposed to achieve. | Concept mapping, in the structured sense developed by William Trochim, is a mixed-method process that lets a group develop a shared conceptual framework on a topic and represent it as a visual map. Participants generate statements about a focus question, sort them into thematic piles, and rate them; multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis then turn those sortings into a two-dimensional map of clustered ideas. Widely used in social-work and human-services planning and evaluation, it combines the openness of group brainstorming with the rigor of quantitative analysis to surface and structure stakeholder thinking. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|