ScholarGate
Asistent

Compară metode

Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.

List Experiment×Conjoint Survey Experiment×
DomeniuPolitical SciencePolitical Science
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Anul apariției20112014
Autorul originalSurvey methodology; modern estimators by Kosuke Imai, Graeme Blair, Adam GlynnJens Hainmueller, Daniel Hopkins, Teppei Yamamoto
TipSensitive-question survey experimentMulti-attribute forced-choice survey experiment with design-based causal estimands
Sursa seminalăImai, K. (2011). Multivariate Regression Analysis for the Item Count Technique. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 106(494), 407–416. DOI ↗Hainmueller, J., Hopkins, D. J., & Yamamoto, T. (2014). Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments. Political Analysis, 22(1), 1–30. DOI ↗
Denumiri alternativeItem count technique, Unmatched count technique, Item count method, List randomizationCausal conjoint, Forced-choice conjoint experiment, AMCE conjoint, Conjoint experiment
Înrudite34
RezumatThe list experiment, also called the item count technique, is a survey design that measures the prevalence of a sensitive attitude or behavior without ever requiring any respondent to directly disclose it. Respondents are randomly split into two groups: a control group sees a list of innocuous items and reports only how many apply to them, while a treatment group sees the same list plus one sensitive item. Because respondents report only a count, no individual answer reveals their stance on the sensitive item, and the difference in average counts between the groups estimates the proportion holding the sensitive trait.A conjoint survey experiment presents respondents with profiles — of candidates, immigrants, policies, or products — described by several attributes whose levels are independently randomized, and asks respondents to choose between or rate the profiles. Hainmueller, Hopkins, and Yamamoto's 2014 framework places this design on a rigorous causal footing, defining the average marginal component effect (AMCE) as the design-based causal effect of an attribute level, averaged over the randomization distribution of all other attributes. It lets political scientists estimate the relative causal weight of many decision factors simultaneously from realistic, multidimensional choices.
ScholarGateSet de date
  1. v1
  2. 3 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED

Mergi la căutare Descarcă prezentarea

ScholarGateCompară metode: List Experiment · Conjoint Survey Experiment. Preluat la 2026-06-24 de pe https://scholargate.app/ro/compare