Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Extensia pe intervale a metodei TOPSIS× | Proces Ierarhic Analitic× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Luarea deciziilor | Luarea deciziilor |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2006 | 1980 |
| Autorul original≠ | Jahanshahloo, G. R., Lotfi, F. H., Izadikhah, M. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Tip≠ | Interval outranking/ranking — Interval Number (IN: [a, b]) | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Jahanshahloo, G. R., Lotfi, F. H., Izadikhah, M. (2006). An algorithmic method to extend TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data. Applied Mathematics and Computation DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 |
| Denumiri alternative | — | — |
| Înrudite | 8 | 8 |
| Rezumat≠ | IV-TOPSIS (Interval extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Jahanshahloo, G. R., Lotfi, F. H., Izadikhah, M. in 2006. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|