Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Studiu de caz multiplu interpretativ× | Studiu de caz interpretativ singular× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Calitativ | Calitativ |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1980s–1990s (Yin 1984; Stake 1995, 2006) | 1978–1995 (Stake 1978, 1995; Yin 1984) |
| Autorul original≠ | Robert K. Yin (multiple case study design); Robert E. Stake (collective/interpretive case study) | Robert E. Stake (intrinsic/interpretive framing); Robert K. Yin (design typology) |
| Tip | Qualitative research design | Qualitative research design |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 | Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803957671 |
| Denumiri alternative | multi-site interpretive case study, collective case study, interpretive multi-case design, constructivist multiple case study | single-site case study, intrinsic case study, interpretive case research, bounded single-case inquiry |
| Înrudite | 5 | 5 |
| Rezumat≠ | Interpretive multiple case study is a qualitative research design in which the researcher studies two or more bounded cases in depth, using an interpretivist stance to understand how participants construct meaning within each setting. Rather than seeking law-like generalizations, it aims to generate rich, context-sensitive understanding that is then compared across cases to reveal patterns, contrasts, and theoretical insights. | An interpretive single case study is a qualitative research design that examines one bounded instance — a person, organisation, event, programme, or community — in depth, with the explicit goal of understanding what that case means to the people within it. Drawing on Stake's notion of the intrinsic case and an interpretivist epistemological stance, the approach treats meaning as socially constructed and context-dependent, making rich, contextual understanding its primary output. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|