Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Studiu de caz interpretativ× | Teoria Fundamentată× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu≠ | Calitativ | Cercetare calitativă |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1978–1995 (Stake's foundational works) | 1967 |
| Autorul original≠ | Robert E. Stake; extended by Bent Flyvbjerg | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss |
| Tip≠ | Qualitative research design | Method |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803957671 | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative≠ | intrinsic case study, constructivist case study, qualitative case study, naturalistic case study | GT, Grounded Theory Approach |
| Înrudite≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Rezumat≠ | Interpretive case study is a qualitative research design in which the researcher selects a bounded real-world case — a person, program, event, organization, or community — and seeks to understand it from the inside, through the meanings participants themselves construct. Unlike explanatory or descriptive case study, the interpretive variant foregrounds the researcher's active role in making sense of complex, context-laden data rather than testing hypotheses or cataloguing facts. | Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|