Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Extensia intuitivă a MABAC× | Proces Ierarhic Analitic× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Luarea deciziilor | Luarea deciziilor |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2021 | 1980 |
| Autorul original≠ | Li, Y. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Tip≠ | Intuitionistic outranking/ranking — Intuitionistic Fuzzy Number (IFN: μ, ν; μ+ν ≤ 1) | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Pamučar, D., & Ćirović, G. (2015). The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC). Expert Systems with Applications, 42(6), 3016-3028. [Canonical MABAC source; cited in place of the retracted Li (2021) intuitionistic-fuzzy MABAC paper, doi:10.1155/2021/5536751.] DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 |
| Denumiri alternative | — | — |
| Înrudite | 8 | 8 |
| Rezumat≠ | IF-MABAC (Intuitionistic extension of MABAC) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Li, Y. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|