Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Criptare Homomorfă× | Confidențialitate Diferențială× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Confidențialitate | Confidențialitate |
| Familie | Machine learning | Machine learning |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2009 | 2006 |
| Autorul original≠ | Craig Gentry | Cynthia Dwork |
| Tip≠ | Lattice-based cryptographic scheme | Privacy-preserving randomized mechanism |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Gentry, C. (2009). Fully homomorphic encryption using ideal lattices. ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), 169–178. DOI ↗ | Dwork, C. (2006). Differential privacy. International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP), 1–12. DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | FHE, Fully Homomorphic Encryption, Leveled Homomorphic Encryption, Homomorfik Şifreleme | DP, epsilon-differential privacy, randomized privacy, Diferansiyel Gizlilik |
| Înrudite | 3 | 3 |
| Rezumat≠ | Homomorphic Encryption (HE) is a cryptographic framework that allows arbitrary computations to be performed directly on encrypted data without requiring decryption. First realized as a fully general construction by Craig Gentry in 2009 using ideal lattices, it enables a server to process sensitive data and return an encrypted result that, when decrypted by the data owner, equals the result of performing the same computation on the plaintext. It is foundational to privacy-preserving machine learning, secure cloud computing, and confidential analytics. | Differential privacy is a mathematical framework for releasing statistical information about a dataset while providing rigorous guarantees that individual records cannot be identified or inferred. Introduced by Cynthia Dwork in 2006, it formalizes privacy as a probabilistic bound: any single individual's presence or absence in the dataset changes the output distribution by at most a multiplicative factor of e^ε, where ε is the privacy budget controlling the privacy–utility tradeoff. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|