Compară metode

	Diferența-în-Diferențe pentru Efecte de Tratament Eterogene (HTE-DiD)	Metoda Controlului Sintetic (MCS)
Domeniu	Inferență cauzală	Inferență cauzală
Familie	Regression model	Regression model
Anul apariției	2021	2003–2010
Autorul original	Callaway & Sant'Anna; Sun & Abraham	Alberto Abadie & Javier Gardeazabal (2003); Abadie, Diamond & Hainmueller (2010)
Tip	Causal inference / panel regression	Quasi-experimental causal inference
Sursa seminală	Callaway, B., & Sant'Anna, P. H. C. (2021). Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 200-230.	Abadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2010). Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California's Tobacco Control Program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(490), 493-505.
Denumiri alternative	HTE-DiD, heterogeneous DiD, CATT estimator, group-time ATT	SCM, synthetic control, synth estimator, Abadie-Diamond-Hainmueller method
Înrudite	4	4
Rezumat	HTE-DiD extends the classic Difference-in-Differences estimator to settings where treatment effects vary across units, time periods, or treatment cohorts. Developed formally by Callaway and Sant'Anna (2021) and Sun and Abraham (2021), it avoids the biases that arise when a conventional two-way fixed-effects regression is used with staggered adoption or effect heterogeneity, by estimating cohort-and-time-specific average treatment effects that can then be aggregated flexibly.	The Synthetic Control Method estimates the causal effect of a treatment or policy on a single treated unit by constructing a weighted combination of untreated units — the synthetic control — that closely resembles the treated unit before the intervention. The gap between the treated unit and its synthetic counterpart after the intervention is the estimated treatment effect.