Compară metode

	Grey-EDAS	Proces Ierarhic Analitic	Procesul Analitic al Rețelei (AHP cu feedback și interdependențe)
Domeniu	Luarea deciziilor	Luarea deciziilor	Luarea deciziilor
Familie	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
Anul apariției	2017	1980	1996
Autorul original	Stanujkic, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Turskis, Z.	Saaty, T. L.	Saaty, T. L.
Tip	Grey outranking/ranking — Grey Interval Number (GIN: [x̲, x̄])	Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)	Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure)
Sursa seminală	Stanujkic, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Turskis, Z. (2017). An Extension of the EDAS Method Based on the Use of Interval Grey Numbers. Studies in Informatics and Control	Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713	Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8
Denumiri alternative	—	—	—
Înrudite	8	8	8
Rezumat	GREY-EDAS (Grey-EDAS — Grey extension of EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Stanujkic, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Turskis, Z. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.