Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Scala de Calitate a Vieții Legată de Sănătate în BRGE× | Indexul Cardinal al Simptomelor Gastroparezei× | Evaluarea Calității Vieții Pacientului cu Constipație× | Criteriile de diagnostic Roma IV pentru sindromul de intestin iritabil× | Chestionar scurt pentru boala inflamatorie intestinală× | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Gastroenterologie | Gastroenterologie | Gastroenterologie | Gastroenterologie | Gastroenterologie |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1996 | 2003 | 2005 | 2016 | 2004 |
| Autorul original≠ | Velanovich, V., Zhang, Y., Hollis, J. B., et al. | Revicki, D. A., Rentz, A. M., Dubois, D., et al. | Marquis, P., De La Loge, C., Dubois, D., et al. | Rome Foundation (multinational expert consensus) | Guyonnet, D., Chassany, O., Ducroc, R., et al. |
| Tip≠ | Self-report | Self-report | Self-report | Diagnostic Criteria | Self-report |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Velanovich, V., Zhang, Y., Hollis, J. B., Feldman, M. I., Sampliner, R., Guan, W., & Escamilla, C. (1996). Presenting symptoms and outcome measures in reflux esophagitis. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 41(10), 1865–1873. link ↗ | Revicki, D. A., Rentz, A. M., Dubois, D., Kahrilas, P., Stanghellini, V., Talley, N. J., & Tack, J. (2003). Development and validation of a patient-assessed gastroparesis symptom severity index. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 18(1), 141–150. link ↗ | Marquis, P., De La Loge, C., Dubois, D., McDermott, A., & Chassany, O. (2005). Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life questionnaire. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 40(5), 540–551. DOI ↗ | Mearin, F., Lacy, B. E., Chang, L., et al. (2016). Bowel disorders. Gastroenterology. Published online June 2016 by the Rome Foundation. link ↗ | Guyonnet, D., Chassany, O., Ducroc, R., Picard, C., Mouret, M., D'Haens, G., & Svartz, H. (2004). Effect of fermented milk containing Bifidobacterium animalis DN-173 010 on the health-related quality of life and symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome in adults in France: A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 20(4), 459–465. link ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative≠ | GERD-HRQL, GERD-HRQoL | GCSI | PAC-QoL, PAC-Q | Rome IV IBS, Rome Criteria | IBDQ-32, Short IBDQ |
| Înrudite | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Rezumat≠ | The GERD Health-Related Quality of Life Scale (GERD-HRQL) is a concise, validated patient-reported outcome measure for assessing the symptomatic and functional impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Developed by Velanovich and colleagues in 1996, the 9-item GERD-HRQL measures heartburn frequency and severity, regurgitation, and impact on sleep and medication use. The scale is highly responsive to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and is widely used in GERD trials and clinical practice. | The Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) is a validated, patient-reported outcome measure specifically designed to assess symptom severity in gastroparesis. Developed by Revicki and colleagues in 2003, the GCSI captures the three cardinal symptom clusters of gastroparesis: nausea and vomiting, postprandial fullness, and early satiety, plus bloating and stomach distension. The 9-item questionnaire is responsive to treatment changes and is increasingly used in clinical trials and practice to monitor gastroparesis progression and therapy response. | The Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QoL) is a validated, patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess the impact of functional constipation on physical, psychological, and social well-being. Developed by Marquis and colleagues in 2005, the PAC-QoL comprises 28 items organized into four domains: Physical Discomfort, Psychosocial Discomfort, Worries and Concerns, and Satisfaction. The PAC-QoL is responsive to treatment and widely used in constipation clinical trials and practice. | The Rome IV criteria are the internationally accepted diagnostic standard for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), published in 2016 by the Rome Foundation. These criteria define IBS as recurrent abdominal pain (≥1 day per week for ≥3 months) associated with altered bowel habits, without structural or biochemical abnormalities. IBS is subtyped into four patterns—IBS-constipation predominant (IBS-C), IBS-diarrhea predominant (IBS-D), IBS-mixed (IBS-M), and IBS-unclassified (IBS-U)—based on stool consistency patterns. | The Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ-32) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess the impact of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)—both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease—on health-related quality of life. Derived from the original 32-item IBDQ, this instrument comprises four domains: Bowel Symptoms, Systemic Symptoms, Social Function, and Emotional Function. The IBDQ-32 is responsive to treatment and is increasingly used in IBD clinical trials and practice. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|
|
|
|