ScholarGate
Asistent

Compară metode

Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.

Analiza Compromisului Flexibil și Universal×Metoda de ponderare obiectivă CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs)×
DomeniuLuarea deciziilorLuarea deciziilor
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Anul apariției20002016
Autorul originalRaveh, A.Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.
TipWeighted rank aggregation (Borda-type with rank-based weights)Relative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based)
Sursa seminalăRaveh, A. (2000). Co-plot: A graphic display method for geometrical representations of MCDM. European Journal of Operational Research DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗
Denumiri alternative
Înrudite88
RezumatFUCA (Flexible and Universal Compromise Analysis) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Raveh, A. in 2000. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateSet de date
  1. v1
  2. 1 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED

Mergi la căutare Descarcă prezentarea

ScholarGateCompară metode: FUCA · CILOS. Preluat la 2026-06-17 de pe https://scholargate.app/ro/compare