Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Observația participantă față în față× | Cercetare-acțiune× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu≠ | Metodologia anchetelor | Cercetare calitativă |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | Early 20th century (Chicago School ~1920s; Spradley formalisation 1980) | 1946 |
| Autorul original≠ | Chicago School sociologists (Robert Park, Ernest Burgess); systematised by Raymond Gold (1958) and James Spradley (1980) | Kurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & Bradbury |
| Tip≠ | Qualitative data collection technique | Method |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant Observation. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 978-0030445019 | Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative≠ | in-person participant observation, direct participant observation, fieldwork participant observation, co-present observation | Participatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative Inquiry |
| Înrudite≠ | 5 | 1 |
| Rezumat≠ | Face-to-face participant observation is a qualitative data collection technique in which the researcher physically enters a setting and engages with participants in real time to document social behaviour, interactions, and meaning-making as they naturally occur. Unlike online or remote variants, the researcher is bodily present, enabling direct sensory access to context, non-verbal cues, and the full texture of everyday life in the setting under study. | Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|