Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Sociology of Expectations× | Valuation Studies Method× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Science Technology Studies | Science Technology Studies |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2006 | 2013 |
| Autorul original≠ | Nik Brown, Mads Borup, Harro van Lente, Kornelia Konrad | Claes-Fredrik Helgesson, Fabian Muniesa, Michèle Lamont |
| Tip≠ | Interpretive method for analysing future-oriented expectations | Practice-oriented method for studying valuation |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., & Van Lente, H. (2006). The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3-4), 285-298. DOI ↗ | Helgesson, C.-F., & Muniesa, F. (2013). For what it's worth: an introduction to valuation studies. Valuation Studies, 1(1), 1-10. DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | Expectations analysis, Sociology of promises, Technological hype analysis | Sociology of valuation, Valography, Study of evaluation practices |
| Înrudite | 4 | 4 |
| Rezumat≠ | The sociology of expectations studies how promises, visions, hype, and expectations about the future actively shape the development of science and technology. Set out by Nik Brown, Mads Borup, Harro van Lente, and Kornelia Konrad, it treats expectations not as mere predictions to be judged true or false but as performative resources that mobilise funding, coordinate actors, and guide work—analysing how futures are constructed in the present and with what real effects. | The valuation studies method treats valuation—the production, measurement, ordering, and contestation of worth—as a social practice to be studied empirically rather than a hidden mental act or a settled economic fact. Consolidated by Claes-Fredrik Helgesson and Fabian Muniesa and complemented by Michèle Lamont's comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation, it follows how rankings, metrics, prices, and evaluation procedures actually do their work, and asks how worth comes to be, by whom, with which devices, and to what effect. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|