Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Evaluarea programelor bazată pe documente× | Analiza de conținut× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu≠ | Metode de teren | Calitativ |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1960s–1970s (program evaluation field); document review as formal strategy codified in 1980s–1990s | Systematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 2018 |
| Autorul original≠ | Daniel Stufflebeam; Peter Rossi and Howard Freeman (systematic program evaluation tradition) | Klaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications research |
| Tip≠ | Evaluation research design | Qualitative / mixed-method research technique |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787908331 | Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661 |
| Denumiri alternative≠ | documentary program evaluation, records-based evaluation, document review evaluation, archival program evaluation | İçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysis |
| Înrudite≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Rezumat≠ | Document-based program evaluation is a systematic approach to assessing a program's design, implementation, and outcomes using existing documentary evidence — such as policy statements, implementation reports, budgets, meeting minutes, and program artifacts — rather than primary data collection through interviews or observation. It is particularly suited to retrospective evaluations, accountability reviews, and contexts where direct fieldwork is impractical or infeasible. | Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|